Full lab engagement
Deliverable: A complete test of a provided vulnerable network, from scoping through enumeration and exploitation to privilege escalation, with contemporaneous notes and evidence.
Course
Offensive security practised only on a lab you are authorised to attack, taught through a full engagement — scope, test, escalate, and write the report a client can act on.
7 modules · 4 months
Deliverable: A complete test of a provided vulnerable network, from scoping through enumeration and exploitation to privilege escalation, with contemporaneous notes and evidence.
Deliverable: A structured assessment of a deliberately vulnerable web application against the OWASP Top Ten, with every finding manually verified and reproduction steps recorded.
Deliverable: A client-ready report with an executive summary, prioritised findings, evidence, reproduction steps and remediation advice — the deliverable a client is actually paying for.
Every student gets placement assistance — that is what 100% placement assistance means. It is support for all, not a job for all. We do not promise a specific salary, a specific number of interviews, or placement at any named company, and you should be wary of anyone who does.
The first module is law and scope, before any tool is opened.
Every technique in this course is practised on a lab built to be attacked. Using the same techniques against a system you do not have written authorisation to test is a criminal offence under the Information Technology Act, and the fact that it was easy is not a defence anybody has successfully run.
This is not a disclaimer bolted to the front. It is how professionals work — scope agreed, rules of engagement signed, findings kept inside the boundary — and it is the first thing a serious employer checks that you understand.
A client does not buy your access to their server. They buy a document.
An executive summary somebody with no technical background can act on. Findings with reproduction steps a developer can follow without ringing you. Risk ratings that reflect real business impact rather than a scanner’s severity field. Remediation advice that can actually be implemented by the team who has to do it.
Most candidates are weakest here and it is the most visible differentiator, so it gets a full module and the final project is the report itself.
A scanner produces a list. Some of it is wrong.
Reporting an unverified finding costs you credibility with a client permanently, and it is the fastest way for a junior tester to lose the room. The assessment module trains manual verification of every finding before it goes anywhere near a document — slower, and the only professional option.
Take Ethical Hacking first if security is new to you. This course assumes that ground and goes to professional practice.
It converts best for people already in support, networking or development, where the underlying systems knowledge is present. If that is not you yet, we will say so and suggest the order that works rather than enrol you into a course that will outrun you.
Questions
Everything taught here is practised on a lab environment built for it and on systems you are explicitly authorised to test. Running these techniques against a system you do not have written permission to test is a criminal offence in India under the Information Technology Act, and the first module covers that plainly. We will not teach anyone who intends otherwise.
Ethical Hacking is the foundation — concepts, tooling and the landscape. This is the professional practice — a structured engagement methodology, deeper exploitation and privilege escalation, and above all the reporting. Take Ethical Hacking first if security is new to you; this assumes it.
Because the report is the product. A client pays for a document their developers can act on, and a tester who finds twenty issues but writes them up unclearly delivers less value than one who finds twelve and explains each precisely. It is also the part most candidates are weakest at, which makes it a differentiator.
It gives you a methodology, lab experience and a written report to show, which is what interviews probe. Security hiring generally wants some IT or networking grounding underneath, so it converts best for people already in support, networking or development. We will give you an honest read on your own position rather than a stock answer.
Three details is all we need. A course advisor will call you back.
The offensive counterpart to our cyber security course — methodology, exploitation and reporting, practised exclusively in isolated labs with written authorisation treated as a hard rule.
Networking and Linux foundations, then web application security, SOC monitoring and incident response — practised exclusively in isolated labs, with authorisation treated as a hard rule.
The toolchain taught around the goal it serves — shipping small changes safely and often — rather than as a list of products to name on a CV.
SQL taught against a database big enough that a bad query is noticeably slow, because toy datasets hide performance entirely and performance is half of what the job tests.
Next step
Tell us what you want to learn and we will help you pick the right course, batch and mode.