HDFS and cluster exercise
Deliverable: A dataset loaded into HDFS with replication configured, demonstrating what happens to availability when a node is taken down, written up with observations.
Course
Distributed data processing taught with judgement — Hadoop, Spark and pipeline design, plus the far more common case where a single machine would have been the right answer.
6 modules · 5 months
Deliverable: A dataset loaded into HDFS with replication configured, demonstrating what happens to availability when a node is taken down, written up with observations.
Deliverable: A Spark job profiled in the Spark UI, an expensive shuffle identified and reduced through repartitioning or a broadcast join, with runtimes before and after.
Deliverable: A pipeline taking raw files through cleaning to an analysis-ready partitioned table in Parquet, safe to rerun without duplicating data, with a failing data quality check demonstrated.
Deliverable: A written assessment of three supplied scenarios, deciding for each whether distributed tooling is justified or a single machine would serve better, with reasoning.
Every student gets placement assistance — that is what 100% placement assistance means. It is support for all, not a job for all. We do not promise a specific salary, a specific number of interviews, or placement at any named company, and you should be wary of anyone who does.
The first module is partly about talking students out of the tooling.
Forty million rows is not big data. It fits comfortably on one machine with a sensible index, and moving it onto a cluster buys you complexity, cost and a new category of failure. A great deal of real-world big data infrastructure exists because somebody wanted to use it rather than because the data required it.
An engineer who can size a problem honestly is worth considerably more than one who reaches for Spark by reflex, so the last project is exactly that judgement.
Spark looks deceptively like ordinary code, which is the trap.
A join or a group-by can move the entire dataset across the network, and the difference between a job that takes four minutes and one that takes four hours is usually a shuffle nobody looked at. The second project requires opening the Spark UI, finding the expensive stage and fixing it, with runtimes recorded.
Every pipeline fails eventually, usually at three in the morning.
What matters then is whether running it again fixes things or doubles the data. Idempotency, layered storage and data quality checks that fail loudly rather than quietly passing bad records downstream — these are the difference between a pipeline and a liability, and they get a full module.
The specific tools in this space change every few years.
Distributed storage, partitioning, columnar formats, shuffles, exactly-once semantics — these do not. The course spends its time there, so that when your employer uses something this syllabus does not name, you already understand what it is doing.
Questions
The course uses PySpark, so Python is sufficient and is what most teams write now. Some Spark internals and error messages surface from the JVM, which the course explains rather than hides. If you already know Java, that helps with reading stack traces but it is not required.
MapReduce as a programming model largely is, and the course treats it historically rather than as something you will write. HDFS and YARN remain in a great many existing installations, and cloud object storage has taken over for new work. The concepts — distributed storage, partitioning, shuffles — carry across all of it, which is why they are taught rather than the tool of the month.
Because most datasets called big are not, and a cluster brings real cost and complexity. An engineer who can say "this is forty million rows, put it in PostgreSQL with an index" is more valuable than one who reaches for Spark by reflex. Knowing the boundary is a senior skill and it is teachable.
No. Practice runs on a small multi-node setup provided for the course, and Spark also runs locally for most exercises. What matters for learning is the shape of the problem — partitions, shuffles, failures — and those are visible without renting a hundred machines.
Three details is all we need. A course advisor will call you back.
Statistics, Python, SQL and machine learning taught as one connected discipline, with the emphasis on framing a problem correctly and knowing when a result is not real.
SQL taught against a database big enough that a bad query is noticeably slow, because toy datasets hide performance entirely and performance is half of what the job tests.
Python taught as a working tool rather than a syntax tour — you finish able to read unfamiliar code, automate real tasks, call APIs and write tests that catch your own mistakes.
AWS taught by building and breaking infrastructure rather than by memorising service names, ending with an architecture you have deployed, secured, costed and can defend.
Next step
Tell us what you want to learn and we will help you pick the right course, batch and mode.